Writing.

Well, naturally, I guess negativity comes out which then
begs the question, “Am I a negative person?” My wife would say yes I think,
though to her I justify it as “realistic.” Anyone else, I try to present as the
positive, or at least understanding one. Though, I am easily to see the
negative versus potential. It’s easy for me to see destruction versus progress.
I can say the words, and believe them, but it doesn’t make them a natural thing
for me. I was raised negative, or at least critical. Being critical is being
protected and being protected keeps a person safe. I have a family now and you
better believe I want them safe and sound. If that means I am hyper-critical of
anyone who knocks on my door, then I guess, so be it.
What happens though when you realize a natural tendency in yourself
and want to change it? Like, am I supposed to first superficially follow those
I see as being more positive in my case? Am I supposed to forcefully go out and
meet new people, experience new things I am uncomfortable with to learn new
ways? Is my problem big enough and impacting my life enough to need a counselor?
After all, I don’t want to be negative any more, but I am not sure I want to
attend therapy to talk about such an insignificant problem. After all, I do see
the benefit of being this way, it can provide my family with safety. Those who
stay callous can’t get hurt. Those who see the world as a negative don’t get
let down. You can see that I am naturally leaning the way of negative already,
I am justifying why it should be versus telling you to not be.
I am however, being honest. I am practicing the art of
vulnerability. Though telling the truth may seem a far cry from being more
positive, all roads lead to an improved quality of life. For me, being honest
results in less held secrets, less resentments and judgments of others, and
therefore seeing things, sunny side up versus the hyper-critical way I was
before. Another step I could take to be less negative is to fake being nice?
No. I have tried that. I have tried the smiles and nods, forcefully aching my
muscles as my mind knows these feelings lack authenticity. I used more energy
to smile and nod than If I were genuine and disagreed, thus creating conflict.
No, superficial did not work for me at all.
What did start to work, was probably the most obvious thing
I could have done. This one really gave meaning to missing the forest because
the trees were in the way. I could have, genuinely, looked for the good in all
people. After all, I believe people are made from God who is good, and I doubt he
would make a “bad” thing, so then I believe that people are good. Believing
people are good then results in my smiles and nods and even subtle
disagreements being genuine. A genuine response is typically read by the other,
responses change, and a more intimate relationship is formed. Even if the
relationship is a short-lived bathroom exchange of “excuse me.” This time when
I said the phrase, I meant it. Genuinely believing all people are good and wanting
to support good, it becomes so much easier to do good and want to see good in
others. I am thinking outside of myself, it isn’t all about me.

My writing may have come across as negative, but I
argue that it’s satire. OK, maybe it’s a lot of sarcasm. What is genuine though,
are the words. Not because I want them to be, but because I believe in the meaning
behind them. I want people to do better, be better, and learn, even
if it was in spite of a blog post written by some un-credentialed person.
Ultimately catalysts for change are all around us, what matters is what we
choose to see.
Comments
Post a Comment