Algorithm to success

Being that any psychological job is at the bottom of the hierarchy of sciences, I figured I would delve in the realm of the mathematical. People like numbers (psychology) people get confused and turned off by things they cannot rate. How do I know something is better than something else if there is no RESEARCH to determine it? How can I argue somebody and prove them wrong if I don’t have numbers flowing in my favor? How in the world do I know what to choose for my kid if there are no numbers to determine good, better, best?

So, why not attempt to put qualitative data in a quantitative definition so people know what to do to be successful.

Here it goes:

X+y=xy

BAM!

Your problems are solved. The problems including lack of funds or no ladies or gents wanting you are all wrapped up in that algorithm. Just like in algebra you have the theory, so now you just plug and chug baby.

Obviously X is you and Y is what you believe you can do, so the end result is the version of you believing what you can do. Success isn’t anything more than achieving a goal you have set. So, the you achieving what you believed would happen is the end result.

Now to determine where Y came from. After all, it is half the equation and a critical component to the YOU that is successful.

The Y is a combination of environment and perspective. The environment is anything, past, present, or future that affects you currently and perspective is what you choose to see.

An algorithm for Y could be:

E+P=Y

Environment is given and the perspective is what you choose to see.

P=R

R is resilience. Your amount of resilience is based on what your end result is. You can have a lot of resilience and decide to perceive the situation as for you, or a learning opportunity, or you can have minimal resilience which you are the victim. Both have their place in this world, however the upper levels of resilience tend to be the people who grow and thrive whereas the low resilience or the victim mentality is dependent on the environment changing (not mathematical) to give people what they need.

So, X is still you, but further Y= (E+P). Your physical self X is given and your environment, for the most part is given and beyond your control so that leaves perspective.

Your perspective of yourself, your environment, every situation you’ve ever been in, your abilities or lack thereof, everything ever encountered in your life is based on your perspective as to it’s role in your life.

P equals the whole being of success. I can be homeless with a positive attitude and be successful. I could be a millionaire with a crappy attitude and be a loser. Success is your perspective, not what the world wants from you. By allowing the environment to define what success is for you would mean that E=XY where your ideal self is equivalent to what the environment promotes?

No no no. That makes no mathematical or psychological sense. Yes, it is wrong in both the highest and lowest rungs of science.

Math is hard but this equation isn’t. Your problems are what you perceive as problems and therefore are still your own doing. To blame the environment, including others, for your problem means that you are at the mercy of an ever changing world that really could care less about your needs.